Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 06 Feb 2003 15:33:53 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: gcc -O2 vs gcc -Os performance |
| |
>> gcc-3.2 >> >> 2901299 vmlinux.O2 >> 2667827 vmlinux.Os >> > > In an earlier message, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> >> 894822 Feb 5 23:50 /boot/vmlinuz-2.5.59-mjb3-Os >> 906203 Feb 5 22:46 /boot/vmlinuz-2.5.59-mjb3.old > > And if you compare both with same/no compression?
980233 Feb 6 11:15 /boot/vmlinuz-2.5.59-mjb3 914965 Feb 6 09:34 /boot/vmlinuz-2.5.59-mjb3.old
Those were probably the right files. (O2 and Os respectively) I didn't look too closely at the time. Looks like 2.95 produces smaller files with O2 than 3.2 does with -Os. Bah.
/me cheers for gcc 2.95.4
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |