[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.5.59 kernel bugs
<> wrote:
> FWIW, here's a list of potential 2.5.59 kernel bugs. Some of these
> might be causing real trouble. Many are probably benign. A few may be
> non-bugs that are just poor coding style although I've tried to weed

I assume you picked these up with `gcc -W'?

gcc -W generates ten megabytes of warnings, with a few gems. We really need
finer-grained control of gcc warnings so that the good ones can be turned on.
gcc warnings are being redone at present and this might yet happen...

> fs/super.c:313 if (!sb->s_op->sync_fs);

That's fixed in 2.5.59++

> net/ipv4/fib_hash.c:944 if (iter->zone->fz_next);

That too. davem said "OMG that's scary :)"

> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:235 if (!super_block | (super_block->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE)) {

I'll fix that up.

As for the rest well gee. Perhaps we should stick #error's in there to
flush out some people who can test the fixes.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.051 / U:7.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site