[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
Jeff Muizelaar wrote:-

> There is also tcc (
> It claims to support gcc-like inline assembler, appears to be much
> smaller and faster than gcc. Plus it is GPL so the liscense isn't a
> problem either.

It doesn't expand macros correctly, however, and accepts an enormous
range of invalid code without a single diagnostic. I'm pretty sure
it's arithmetic rules are incorrect, too. It's certainly nowhere
near C89 compliance.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.118 / U:35.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site