Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Feb 2003 07:02:56 +0000 | From | Neil Booth <> | Subject | Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance |
| |
Jeff Muizelaar wrote:-
> There is also tcc (http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/tcc/) > It claims to support gcc-like inline assembler, appears to be much > smaller and faster than gcc. Plus it is GPL so the liscense isn't a > problem either.
It doesn't expand macros correctly, however, and accepts an enormous range of invalid code without a single diagnostic. I'm pretty sure it's arithmetic rules are incorrect, too. It's certainly nowhere near C89 compliance.
Neil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |