Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Feb 2003 01:03:46 -0500 | From | Mark Mielke <> | Subject | Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance |
| |
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:21:01PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > I'd love to see a small - and fast - C compiler, and I'd be willing to > > make kernel changes to make it work with it. > I can't offer any immediate help with this but I want the same thing. At > some point, we're planning on funding some extensions into GCC or whatever > reasonable C compiler is around: > - associative arrays as a builtin type > - regular expressions > - tk bindings built in
What is the problem with C++ or objective C?
I doubt that the GCC people would accept these sort of additions, even if complete.
mark
-- mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________ . . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder |\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ | | | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |