[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.4.21pre4aa1
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

>On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:12:03PM -0800, Samuel Flory wrote:
>>Is the dac960 compile still broken? Or did it break again?
>>make[3]: Entering directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block'
>>gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/include -Wall
>>-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
>>-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686
>>-nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=DAC960 -DEXPORT_SYMTAB
>>-c DAC960.c
>>DAC960.c: In function `DAC960_ProcessCompletedBuffer':
>>DAC960.c:3029: warning: passing arg 1 of `blk_finished_io' makes pointer
>>from integer without a cast
>>DAC960.c:3029: too few arguments to function `blk_finished_io'
>>make[3]: *** [DAC960.o] Error 1
>>make[3]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block'
>>make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
>>make[2]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers/block'
>>make[1]: *** [_subdir_block] Error 2
>>make[1]: Leaving directory `/stuff/src/linux-2.4.21-pre4-aa1/drivers'
>>make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2
>It was supposed to be fixed I need to re-check.. (I usually don't
>compile it so I didn't notice sorry)

Just wondering it looked familar. I think I've got the patch someone
posted a while back.

There is no such thing as obsolete hardware.
Merely hardware that other people don't want.
(The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory <>

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.053 / U:5.856 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site