Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:05:21 +0100 | Subject | Re: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH] s4bios for 2.5.59 + apci-20030123 | From | Ducrot Bruno <> |
| |
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:10:04PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > This patch is for s4bios support in 2.5.59 with acpi-20030123. > > > > > > This is the 'minimal' requirement. Some devices (especially the > > > IDE part) are not well resumed. Handle with care.. > > > > > > Note also that the resuming part (I mean IDE) was more stable > > > with an equivalent patch when I tested with 2.5.54 (grumble > > > grumble)... > > > > > > I think also that it is a 'good' checker for devices power management > > > in general... > > > > I'd really rather just have S4OS (aka swsusp) in 2.5 patches -- if the > > OS can do S4 on its own, that is really preferable to S4bios. > > Well, we already have S4OS, and having S4OS does not mean we can't > have S4bios. > > Some people apparently want slower suspend/resume but have all caches > intact when resumed. Thats not easy for swsusp but they can have that > with S4bios. And S4bios is usefull for testing device support; it > seems to behave slightly differently to S3 meaning better testing. >
Yep, correct. The problem is that now I have more trouble with s4bios in general with 2.5. That worked more reliability with 'older' 2.5 series. Really don't know why.
Cheers,
-- Ducrot Bruno
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |