Messages in this thread |  | | From | John Bradford <> | Subject | Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance | Date | Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:24:44 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> >There is also tcc (http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/tcc/) > >It claims to support gcc-like inline assembler, appears to be much > >smaller and faster than gcc. Plus it is GPL so the liscense isn't a > >problem either. > >Though, I am not really sure of the quality of code generated or of how > >mature it is. > > tcc is interesting. The code generation is pretty simplistic (read: > trivially horrible for most things), but it sure is fast and small. And > judging by the changelog, Fabrice is trying to compile the kernel with > it. > > For a lot of problems, small-and-fast is good.
Maybe otcc is a better choice, then?
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/otcc/
:-)
John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |