lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Patch: oom_kill
Date
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 06:32 am, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> A small patch to discuss, it's about killing an process in an out-of-memory
> condition. First from the code I don't see any prohibition that it kills
> init, if reaches maximum badness points, don't think thats something
> anybody anytime wants. Sure for desktop systems this very unlikely to ever
> occur, but for small embedded systems that could happen.

ok.

> Second proposal is to give processes that are direct childs from init a
> special bonus, normally that are those we don't want to get killed. They
> are either important or get respawned eitherway creating an endless oom
> condition loop when killing them.

And what about processes that get reparented to init? These could be causing
the OOM. I didn't think that the p_ptr was null when reparenting happens.

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.045 / U:2.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site