Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:25:36 +0100 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance |
| |
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:13:31PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > I'm afraid it's code generation engine. It is just worse than > > M$ or Intel's one. It is not easily fixable, > > GCC folks have tremendous task at hand. > > > > I wonder whether some big companies supposedly supporting > > Linux (e.g. Intel) can help GCC team (for example by giving > > away some code and/or developer time). > > Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting. > Anyone got a copy and some time to burn?
There are already people who have done this, e.g.
http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html
compares g++ and Intel's C++ compiler with C++ code.
> M.
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |