[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
    On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:13:31PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    > > I'm afraid it's code generation engine. It is just worse than
    > > M$ or Intel's one. It is not easily fixable,
    > > GCC folks have tremendous task at hand.
    > >
    > > I wonder whether some big companies supposedly supporting
    > > Linux (e.g. Intel) can help GCC team (for example by giving
    > > away some code and/or developer time).
    > Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting.
    > Anyone got a copy and some time to burn?

    There are already people who have done this, e.g.

    compares g++ and Intel's C++ compiler with C++ code.

    > M.



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.019 / U:3.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site