Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:14:06 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance |
| |
On 4 Feb 2003, Andi Kleen wrote: > > If you want small and fast use lcc.
lcc isn't really something I want to use, since the license is so strange, and thus can't be improved upon if there are issues with it.
Some people have used the Intel compiler - which obviously also cannot be improved upon, but which is likely to start off pretty good. I don't really want to use it myself - what I'd really like to see is gcc splitting up just the C compiler as a separate project with more attention to size and speed.
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |