lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
From
Date

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 12:45, Herman Oosthuysen wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> From my experience, the speed issue is caused by misalligned memory
> accesses, causing inefficient SDRAM to Cache movement of data and
> instructions.
>
> I don't think that you necessarily need a modification to the compiler.
> What you can do is carefully place the ALLIGN switch in a few critical
> places in the kernel code, to ensure that the code and data will be
> properly alligned for whatever processor it is compiled for, be that a
> Pentium, an ARM, a MIPS or whatever.
>

I guess I would like the compiler to do that without having to go
in and futz the code.

> It would be nice if GCC can be suitably improved to do this correcly for
> all architectures, but a little bit of human help can do wonders,
> without having to fork the GCC project.
>
> Cheers,
--
Timothy D. Witham - Lab Director - wookie@osdlab.org
Open Source Development Lab Inc - A non-profit corporation
15275 SW Koll Parkway - Suite H - Beaverton OR, 97006
(503)-626-2455 x11 (office) (503)-702-2871 (cell)
(503)-626-2436 (fax)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.084 / U:10.552 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site