[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
    >    I'm hesitant to enter into this.  But from my own experience
    > the issue with big companies supporting these sort of changes
    > in gcc have more to do with the acceptance process of changes
    > into gcc than a lack of desire on the large companies part.

    Maybe we should create a KGCC fork, optimise it for kernel
    complilations, then try to get our changes merged back in to GCC
    mainline at a later date.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.035 / U:5.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site