lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
    Date
    >    I'm hesitant to enter into this.  But from my own experience
    > the issue with big companies supporting these sort of changes
    > in gcc have more to do with the acceptance process of changes
    > into gcc than a lack of desire on the large companies part.

    Maybe we should create a KGCC fork, optimise it for kernel
    complilations, then try to get our changes merged back in to GCC
    mainline at a later date.

    John.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.019 / U:63.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site