lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
Date
>    I'm hesitant to enter into this.  But from my own experience
> the issue with big companies supporting these sort of changes
> in gcc have more to do with the acceptance process of changes
> into gcc than a lack of desire on the large companies part.

Maybe we should create a KGCC fork, optimise it for kernel
complilations, then try to get our changes merged back in to GCC
mainline at a later date.

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans