lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:27:28AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >>> Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting.
> >>> Anyone got a copy and some time to burn?
> >>
> >> There are already people who have done this, e.g.
> >>
> >> http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html
> >>
> >> compares g++ and Intel's C++ compiler with C++ code.
> >
> > C would be infinitely more interesting ;-)
>
> Speaking of which, has anyone ever compiled the ia32 Linux kernel with the
> Intel compiler? I thought I saw some patches floating around to make it
> compile the ia64 kernel .... that'd be an interesting test case ... might
> give us some ideas about what could be tweaked in GCC (or code rejiggled in
> the kernel).
>
> M.

Martin -

Like this?

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103559880923586&w=2

-- Patrick Mansfield
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.065 / U:0.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site