lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
    > I'm afraid it's code generation engine. It is just worse than
    > M$ or Intel's one. It is not easily fixable,
    > GCC folks have tremendous task at hand.
    >
    > I wonder whether some big companies supposedly supporting
    > Linux (e.g. Intel) can help GCC team (for example by giving
    > away some code and/or developer time).

    Comparing Intel's compiler vs GCC on Linux would be more interesting.
    Anyone got a copy and some time to burn?

    M.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.020 / U:239.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site