Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: PnP model | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 03 Feb 2003 15:45:09 +0000 |
| |
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:55, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > I strongly vote to follow the same behaviour as PCI code does: > It means call the activation / enabling / setting functions from the > probe() callbacks. Only the driver knows what's the best. Including > the manual assignment of resources.
I agree. A lot of drivers should be able to use one model for everything including "enable_device" stuff. Right now its all a bit too detailed.
Also the locking model seems very unclear and there are hot swappable ISA bays
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |