[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PnP model
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:55, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> I strongly vote to follow the same behaviour as PCI code does:
> It means call the activation / enabling / setting functions from the
> probe() callbacks. Only the driver knows what's the best. Including
> the manual assignment of resources.

I agree. A lot of drivers should be able to use one model for everything
including "enable_device" stuff. Right now its all a bit too detailed.

Also the locking model seems very unclear and there are hot swappable ISA

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.073 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site