lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectPnP model
Hi all,

I think that we need to discuss deeply the right PnP model. The
actual changes proposed by Adam are going to be more and more complex
without allowing the user interactions inside the "auto" steps. The
auto-configuration might be good and bad as we all know, but having an
method to skip it is necessary.

I strongly vote to follow the same behaviour as PCI code does:
It means call the activation / enabling / setting functions from the
probe() callbacks. Only the driver knows what's the best. Including
the manual assignment of resources.

Jaroslav

-----
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz>
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
ALSA Project, SuSE Labs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.061 / U:1.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site