Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:22:20 +0100 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance |
| |
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 03:05:06PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > The results below leaves me distinctly unconvinced by the supposed > merits of modern gcc's. Not really better or worse, within experimental > error. But much slower to compile things with.
Curious - could you compare it with a gcc 3.3 snapshot too?
It should be even slower at compiling, but generate better code.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |