[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 03:05:06PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> The results below leaves me distinctly unconvinced by the supposed
> merits of modern gcc's. Not really better or worse, within experimental
> error. But much slower to compile things with.

Curious - could you compare it with a gcc 3.3 snapshot too?

It should be even slower at compiling, but generate better code.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.123 / U:2.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site