[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CPU throttling??
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 13:57:17 -0500 wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:13:02 GMT, John Bradford said:
> > Incidently, Linux has always halted the processor, rather than spun in
> > an idle loop, which saves power.
> It's conceivable that a CPU halted at 1.2Gz takes less power than one
> at 1.6Gz - anybody have any actual data on this? Alternately phrased,
> does CPU throttling save power over and above what the halt does?

Yes. I have a powerpc laptop that runs at 700 MHz. If I throttle the CPU clock
speed down to 400 MHz and change nothing else the battery has noticeably longer
life; since it's running slower, it takes less power when it's active (not

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.043 / U:7.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site