[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: anticipatory scheduling questions
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Andrew Morton <>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:26:04 -0800
To: "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <>
Subject: Re: anticipatory scheduling questions

> "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <> wrote:
> > Indeed, this can be tested interactively with an application like Evolution:
> > I have configured Evolution to use 2 dictionaries (English and Spanish) for
> > spell checking in e-mail messages. When running 2.4.20, if I choose to reply
> > to a large message, it only takes a few seconds to read both dictionaries
> > from disk and perform the spell checking.
> > However, on 2.5.63-mm1 the same process takes considerably longer. Any
> > reason for this?
> Could you boot with elevator-deadline and retest?

I have done benchmark tests with Evolution under the following conditions: (times measured since the reply
button is clicked until the message is opened)

2.4.20-2.54 -> 9s
2.5.63-mm1 w/Deadline -> 34s
2.5.63-mm1 w/AS -> 33s

The 2.4.20-2.54 is *not* a stock kernel, but Red Hat's own patched kernel (I think they include most of Alan Cox
patches). Times are measured manually (don't know how to "time" the time elapsed since I click a button and
the reply window is opened). Also, the filesystem is "ext2" running on a laptop (not a really fast hard disk).

> How large are the dictionary files?

Well, the aspell dictionary files are roughly 16MB for the Spanish dictionary and 4MB for the English one.
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.033 / U:1.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site