[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectPatch: small devfs
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Andrew Walrond wrote:
>[...] I want to give this another whirl, but your latest
>patch doesn't apply cleanly against 2.5.63+ (fs/devfs/base.c fails). Any
>chance of an update?

I have made a new version of my small devfs patch against
linux-2.5.62.bk4. This version fixes a bug where directory->i_sem was
held while devfs_helper ran, which caused deadlock on one system. I
am surprised I had not noticed this problem before. This version also
adds Documentation/filesystems/devfs/small-devfs, describing
differences between the old devfs implementation and this one. You can
retrieve the patch from the following URL.

As before, the optional devfs_helper user level program can
be retrived from:

My "to do" list for small devfs is now as follows.

- Submit a patch to the -mm kernels, as Andrew has been
kind enough to distribute this change in his -mm kernels.
- Explore eliminating by fs/devfs/fs.c by extending
dnotify and ramfs slightly.
- Probably request integration after linux-2.7.0.

Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road \ / Milpitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
"Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.027 / U:15.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site