[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Protecting processes from the OOM killer
    Dan Kegel <> writes:

    > Alan Cox wrote:
    > > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 01:21, Dan Kegel wrote:
    > >
    > > Everything else is armwaving "works half the time" stuff. By the time
    > > the OOM kicks in the game is already over.
    > Even with overcommit disallowed, the OOM killer is going to run
    > when my users try to run too big a job, so I would still like
    > the OOM killer to behave "well".

    If OOM is called you've overcommitted memory, so this isn't true
    ... no overcommit == NULL from malloc() etc.

    # James Antill --
    * ^From: .*james@and\.org
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.019 / U:7.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site