[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] New dcache / inode hash tuning patch
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 18:33, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Can you play a bit with the hash table sizes? Perhaps double the
>> dcache hash and half the inode hash ?
>> I suspect it really just needs a better hash function. I'll cook
>> something up based on FNV hash.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:21:38AM +0000, Gianni Tedesco wrote:
> Didn't wli do some work in this area? I seem to recall him recommending
> FNV1a for dcache...

The work I did here was inconclusive but _suggested_ (non-rigorously)
that FNV was merely more expensive with little benefit for the most
straightforward hash function replacement strategy.

More intelligent mixing strategies for parent + child names etc. may
reveal some use for it yet, but I have zero results in that area.

There is much room for experimentation AFAICT.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.034 / U:1.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site