Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: About /etc/mtab and /proc/mounts | From | Miles Bader <> | Date | 27 Feb 2003 17:42:30 +0900 |
| |
Kasper Dupont <kasperd@daimi.au.dk> writes: > > Yes. On some systems, /var and /tmp are the _only_ read-write filesystems. > > OK, but then on such a system with my approach it would be possible to > make /mtab.d a symlink pointing to somewhere under /var.
... you could do the same with /etc/mtab.
In fact since /etc is almost guaranteed to be on the same filesystem as /, it seems like "/mtab.d" offers zero advantages over just /etc/mtab -- the case where /etc/mtab is the most annoying is when /etc is R/O, but this almost always means that / will be R/O, making /mtab.d useless too.
> But AFAIK fsck uses mtab.
It uses /etc/fstab.
> If mtab does not exist mount will attempt to create a new one with > only the root listed.
Unless you use the `-n' flag, which an init-script should do if it knows there's something wierd required to get /var mounted or something.
-Miles -- 80% of success is just showing up. --Woody Allen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |