[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing
Followup to:  <>
By author: Linus Torvalds <>
In newsgroup:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > We could work around both of these: disable the sign compare warning,
> > and use check_gcc to set a high number for -finline-limit...
> Oh, both are work-aroundable, no question about it. The same way it was
> possible to work around the broken aliasing with previous releases. I'm
> just hoping that especially the inline thing can be resolved sanely,
> otherwise we'll end up having to use something ugly like
> -D'inline=inline __attribute__((force_inline))'
> on every single command line..

Isn't this what compiler.h is for? If the complaint is that some
things don't include compiler.h then we may want to force it with
-include. Better all the cruft in one file IMO.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: cris ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.040 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site