[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.5] fix preempt-issues with smp_call_function()
Dave Jones <> wrote:
> Just one comment. You moved quite a few of the preempt_disable/enable
> pairs outside of the CONFIG_SMP checks. The issue we're working against
> here is to try and prevent preemption and ending up on a different CPU.
> As this cannot happen if CONFIG_SMP=n, I don't see why you've done this.

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Just in two places.

Yes, thanks for delivering this better patch!
My approach wanted just to be the most simple possibility... ;-)

Thomas[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.055 / U:1.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site