Messages in this thread | | | From | Thomas Schlichter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][2.5] fix preempt-issues with smp_call_function() | Date | Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:14:30 +0100 |
| |
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> wrote: > Just one comment. You moved quite a few of the preempt_disable/enable > pairs outside of the CONFIG_SMP checks. The issue we're working against > here is to try and prevent preemption and ending up on a different CPU. > As this cannot happen if CONFIG_SMP=n, I don't see why you've done this.
Andrew Morton wrote: > Just in two places. [snip]
Yes, thanks for delivering this better patch! My approach wanted just to be the most simple possibility... ;-)
Thomas[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |