[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
    David Mosberger <> writes:

    > >>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 00:07:50 -0800 (PST), David Lang
    > <> said:
    > David.L> Garrit, you missed the preior posters point. IA64 had the
    > David.L> same fundamental problem as the Alpha, PPC, and Sparc
    > David.L> processors, it doesn't run x86 binaries.
    > This simply isn't true. Itanium and Itanium 2 have full x86 hardware
    > built into the chip (for better or worse ;-). The speed isn't as good
    > as the fastest x86 chips today, but it's faster (~300MHz P6) than the
    > PCs many of us are using and it certainly meets my needs better than
    > any other x86 "emulation" I have used in the past (which includes
    > FX!32 and its relatives for Alpha).

    I have various random x86 binaries that do not work.

    My 32bit x86 user space does not run.

    A 32bit kernel doesn't have a chance.

    So for me at least the 32bit support is not useful in avoiding
    converting binaries. For the handful of apps that cannot be
    recompiled I suspect the support is good enough so you can get them
    to run somehow.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.019 / U:11.592 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site