[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
David Mosberger <> writes:

> >>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 00:07:50 -0800 (PST), David Lang
> <> said:
> David.L> Garrit, you missed the preior posters point. IA64 had the
> David.L> same fundamental problem as the Alpha, PPC, and Sparc
> David.L> processors, it doesn't run x86 binaries.
> This simply isn't true. Itanium and Itanium 2 have full x86 hardware
> built into the chip (for better or worse ;-). The speed isn't as good
> as the fastest x86 chips today, but it's faster (~300MHz P6) than the
> PCs many of us are using and it certainly meets my needs better than
> any other x86 "emulation" I have used in the past (which includes
> FX!32 and its relatives for Alpha).

I have various random x86 binaries that do not work.

My 32bit x86 user space does not run.

A 32bit kernel doesn't have a chance.

So for me at least the 32bit support is not useful in avoiding
converting binaries. For the handful of apps that cannot be
recompiled I suspect the support is good enough so you can get them
to run somehow.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.163 / U:8.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site