[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Horrible L2 cache effects from kernel compile
> Are you sure that this will help?
> With a smaller table, you might cause fewer cache misses for the table
> lookup. Instead you get longer hash chains. Walking linked lists
> probably causes more cache line misses than the single array lookup.

That's true when the hash table has a reasonable size. But with 1MB
and bigger hash tables you are guaranteed to get a cache miss for most
head bucket access, no matter how many dentries you have. The hash
function is actively working against your cache here.

The dentries are actually more likely to fit into dcache because they
don't get artificially spread out over the cache space.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.061 / U:2.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site