lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Server shipments [was Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call]
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:00:42PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Solaris et al failed was because the development model was different?

Solaris can't be recompiled UP AFIK. This whole discussion about UP
performance is almost pointless in linux since we have CONFIG_SMP and we
can recompile it.

Especially if what you care is the desktop (not the UP server), the only
kernel bits that matters for the desktop are the VM, the scheduler and
I/O latency and perpahs the clear_page too. the rest is all a matter of
the X/kde/qt/glibc-dynamiclinking/opengl/memorybloatwithmultiplelibs/etc..
the kernel core-raw performance in the fast paths doesn't matter much for the
desktop, even if the syscall would be twice slower desktop users
wouldn't notice much.

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.124 / U:6.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site