[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ptrace PTRACE_READDATA/WRITEDATA, kernel 2.5.62

> FYI Frank, three things. First of all, I really don't like the
> interface of adding a second address to ptrace; I believe it interferes
> with PIC on x86, since IIRC the extra argument would go in %ebx.
> The BSDs have a nice interface involving passing a request structure.

I don't see the problem since we can pass up to 6 parameters on the i386
architecture. The extra argument will be passed on using the stack as the
other arguments do because of the asmlinkage directive. Using a structure
slows everything down too much; if you can use the stack I think it's
better to do so. What about that PIC?

> Secondly, the implementation should be in kernel/ptrace.c not under
> i386, we're trying to stop doing that.

The implementation is already in kernel/ptrace.c, only the usage lives
under the arch-dependent directories since there the sys_ptrace entries
are located.

> Thirdly, I was going to do this, but I ended up making GDB use pread64
> on /dev/mem instead. It works with no kernel modifications, and is
> just as fast.

mmm... I thought it would be convenient to use ptrace for all the trace


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.029 / U:2.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site