Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:17:58 -0700 | From | yodaiken@fsmlabs ... | Subject | Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call |
| |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:50:31AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Bill Huey (Hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote: > >> especially given some of the IO performance improvement that > >> happened as a courtesy of preempt. > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:40:05AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > There is no evidence for any such thing. Nor has any plausible > > theory been put forward as to why such an improvement should occur. > > There's a vague notion in my head that it should decrease scheduling
Vague notions seems to be the level of data on this topic.
-- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com 1+ 505 838 9109
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |