lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] s390 (7/13): gcc 3.3 adaptions.
    From
    Date
    Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> writes:

    |> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:35:24PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
    |> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
    |> >
    |> > |> Does gcc still warn about things like
    |> > |>
    |> > |> #define COUNT (sizeof(array)/sizeof(element))
    |> > |>
    |> > |> int i;
    |> > |> for (i = 0; i < COUNT; i++)
    |> > |> ...
    |> > |>
    |> > |> where COUNT is obviously unsigned (because sizeof is size_t and thus
    |> > |> unsigned)?
    |> > |>
    |> > |> Gcc used to complain about things like that, which is a FUCKING DISASTER.
    |> >
    |> > How can you distinguish that from other occurrences of (int)<(size_t)?
    |>
    |> The bounds are obviously constant and unsigned at compile time.

    But that's not the point. It's the runtime value of i that gets converted
    (to unsigned), not the compile time value of COUNT. Thus if i ever gets
    negative you have a problem.

    Andreas.

    --
    Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
    SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
    Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
    "And now for something completely different."
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.020 / U:0.264 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site