Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:53:35 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] s390 (7/13): gcc 3.3 adaptions. |
| |
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:35:24PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes: > > |> Does gcc still warn about things like > |> > |> #define COUNT (sizeof(array)/sizeof(element)) > |> > |> int i; > |> for (i = 0; i < COUNT; i++) > |> ... > |> > |> where COUNT is obviously unsigned (because sizeof is size_t and thus > |> unsigned)? > |> > |> Gcc used to complain about things like that, which is a FUCKING DISASTER. > > How can you distinguish that from other occurrences of (int)<(size_t)?
The bounds are obviously constant and unsigned at compile time.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |