lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] s390 (7/13): gcc 3.3 adaptions.
From
Date
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:

|> Does gcc still warn about things like
|>
|> #define COUNT (sizeof(array)/sizeof(element))
|>
|> int i;
|> for (i = 0; i < COUNT; i++)
|> ...
|>
|> where COUNT is obviously unsigned (because sizeof is size_t and thus
|> unsigned)?
|>
|> Gcc used to complain about things like that, which is a FUCKING DISASTER.

How can you distinguish that from other occurrences of (int)<(size_t)?

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.058 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site