lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 06:57:09PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:
> >
> > But that's a false promise because by definition, fine grained threading
> > adds more bus traffic. It's kind of hard to not have that happen, the
> > caches have to stay coherent somehow.
>
> Clearly. And things which require more locking will pay some penalty for
> this. But a quick scan of this list on keyword "lockless' will show that
> people are thinking about this.

Lockless algorithms still generate bus traffic when you do the atomic
compare-and-swap or load-linked or whatever hardware instruction you
use to implement your lockless algorithm. Caches still have to stay
coherent, lock or no lock.

-VAL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.756 / U:42.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site