[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: oom killer and its superior braindamage in 2.4
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Mansfield wrote:

> So you're saying that a process can stay in the D state, without ever
> getting enough resources to complete a single Uninteruptible wait, for
> hours at a time?

Or even in the R state, but that would only happen when there
is a kernel bug. The OOM killer can do nothing but hope for
the best and try another process if the first one doesn't want
to exit.

> Ok. Now I understand your patch. Thanks for the info.
> You should push your patch to Marcelo.

Will do.


Engineers don't grow up, they grow sideways.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.034 / U:3.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site