[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:06:56 -0800, "Martin J. Bligh" <> said:

Linus> Last I saw P4 was kicking ia-64 butt on specint and friends.
>> I don't think so. According to Intel [1], the highest
>> clockfrequency for a 0.18um part is 2GHz (both for Xeon and P4,
>> for Xeon MP it's 1.5GHz). The highest reported SPECint for a
>> 2GHz Xeon seems to be 701 [2]. In comparison, a 1GHz McKinley
>> gets a SPECint of 810 [3].

Martin> Got anything more real-world than SPECint type
Martin> microbenchmarks?

SPECint a microbenchmark? You seem to be redefining the meaning of
the word (last time I checked, lmbench was a microbenchmark).

Ironically, Itanium 2 seems to do even better in the "real world" than
suggested by benchmarks, partly because of the large caches, memory
bandwidth and, I'm guessing, partly because of it's straight-forward
micro-architecture (e.g., a synchronization operation takes on the
order of 10 cycles, as compared to order of dozens and hundres of
cycles on the Pentium 4).

BTW: I hope I don't sound too negative on the Pentium 4/Xeon. It's
certainly an excellent performer for many things. I just want to
point out that Itanium 2 also is a good performer, probably more so
than many on this list seem to be willing to give it credit for.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.137 / U:0.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site