Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:28:56 -0500 | From | Benjamin LaHaise <> | Subject | Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call |
| |
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 11:13:03AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > This simply isn't true. Itanium and Itanium 2 have full x86 hardware > built into the chip (for better or worse ;-). The speed isn't as good > as the fastest x86 chips today, but it's faster (~300MHz P6) than the
That hardly counts as reasonably performant: the slowest mainstream chips from Intel and AMD are clocked well over 1 GHz. At least x86-64 will improve the performance of the 32 bit databases people have already invested large amounts of money in, and it will do so without the need for a massive outlay of funds for a new 64 bit license. Why accept more than 10x the cost to migrate to ia64 when a new x86-64 will improve the speed of existing applications, and improve scalability with the transparent addition of a 64 bit kernel?
-ben -- Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |