lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
    On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 11:13:03AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
    > This simply isn't true. Itanium and Itanium 2 have full x86 hardware
    > built into the chip (for better or worse ;-). The speed isn't as good
    > as the fastest x86 chips today, but it's faster (~300MHz P6) than the

    That hardly counts as reasonably performant: the slowest mainstream chips
    from Intel and AMD are clocked well over 1 GHz. At least x86-64 will
    improve the performance of the 32 bit databases people have already
    invested large amounts of money in, and it will do so without the need
    for a massive outlay of funds for a new 64 bit license. Why accept
    more than 10x the cost to migrate to ia64 when a new x86-64 will improve
    the speed of existing applications, and improve scalability with the
    transparent addition of a 64 bit kernel?

    -ben
    --
    Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.020 / U:65.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site