[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
    On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 03:37:49PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    > >> For instance, don't locks simply get compiled away to nothing on
    > >> uni-processor machines?
    > >
    > > Preempt causes most of the issues of SMP with few of the benefits. There
    > > are loads for which it's ideal, but for general use it may not be the
    > > right feature, and I ran it during the time when it was just a patch, but
    > > lately I'm convinced it's for special occasions.
    > Note that preemption was pushed by the embedded people Larry was advocating
    > for, not the big-machine crowd .... ironic, eh?

    Dig through the mail logs and you'll see that I was completely against the
    preemption patch. I think it is a bad idea, if you want real time, use
    rt/linux, it solves the problem right.
    Larry McVoy lm at
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.019 / U:90.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site