Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:00:35 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: [ATM] who 'owns' the skb created by drivers/atm? | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@sfgoth.com> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:12:55 -0800
Some people seem to be suggesting that we need to zero out ->cb before passing the SKB to netif_rx() but I don't see why that would be neccesary.
It is true, the whole input mechanism depends upon skb->cb[] being clear on new skbs coming in via netif_rx(). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |