lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.x release process comments
Date
Hello,

> I'm not saying it should, but it would be good from a PR
> perspective and as
> an element in the reliability feeling vector ;-)
Not sure about it... People like it when a product looks stable,
and having a -blah or -pre and so on once a week doesn't make
me feel I have some stable product...

> The number of -pre releases shouldn't be limited for its own sake, but
> rather in the process of stabilising the kernel for release.
> So I mean after
> a couple of -pre releases start focussing on debugging and
> then finish with
> a few -rc's before the next cycle starts. That way the diffs
> between full
> versions are smaller and upgrading gets easier.
So, the question is to choose between :
- less releases with more changes
or
- more relaseases with less changes

Is that correct ?

Paul

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.047 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site