lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Longstanding networking / SMP issue? (duplextest)
From
   From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:34:22 +0100

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:20:43AM -0800, Simon Kirby wrote:
> Hmm...and this is considered desired behavior? It seems like an odd way
> of handling packets intended to test latency and reliability. :)

IP is best-effort. Dropping packets in odd cases to make locking simpler
is not unreasonable. Would you prefer an slower kernel?

True.

But this is a quality of implementation issue and I doubt the kernel
would be slower if we fixed this silly behavior.

Frankly, the locking is due to lazyness, rather than a specific design
decision. So let's fix it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.066 / U:3.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site