[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible?

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Adam J. Richter wrote:

> Anyhow, my point is that removing a piece of hardware
> does not require that the corresponding module be unloaded
> immediately.

That's true, but when a piece of hardware is removed, you usually also
want to get rid of some data structures, but if the relevant functions are
not prepared to be called outside of module_exit, you have a huge problem.

bye, Roman

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.033 / U:5.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site