[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 10:20, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> Well, yes and no. Indeed those checks are optimized away, but as a result
> of using them most data-access macros must be converted to inline
> functions. And, last I heard at least, gcc was optimizing inline functions
> much worse than preprocessor macros.

Not true, you can still use macros and GCC is saner with inlines
these days.

Your arguments are nice to encourage your patch to be accepted,
they are however not correct.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.028 / U:5.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site