lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.62
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:09:35PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:39:07AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > usr/lib/arch/arm/MCONFIG | 26
> Any good reasons for such a screaming name?
> makefile.config eventually.

Ask Peter :)

> > usr/lib/arch/arm/Makefile.inc | 31
>
> No extension is used for arch/arm/Makefile
> Why does klibc differ in this respect?
> [An answer that tell me that arch/arm/Makefile should
> change is fine with me..]

Ask Russell :)

> > usr/lib/makeerrlist.pl | 80
> > usr/lib/socketcalls.pl | 75
>
> This mixture of code and scripts to generate code hursts my eye.
> What about usr/scripts/.

But they are the scripts used to build the code in usr/lib. I don't
care where they go, that's just where they were in the klibc tarball.

> I assume you do not want them in scripts/

Yeah, I wouldn't think they should go their either.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.025 / U:6.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site