[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define
    On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

    > Does this help with being able to printk() a <dma_addr_t>? How?
    > Always use a cast to (u64) or something else?

    It doesn't help with printk(), but frankly if you're printing a dma_addr_t
    then you're probably debugging, not performance-tuning, so the cast to u64
    is acceptable.


    It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
    than to open it and remove all doubt.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.019 / U:63.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site