[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> Does this help with being able to printk() a <dma_addr_t>? How?
> Always use a cast to (u64) or something else?

It doesn't help with printk(), but frankly if you're printing a dma_addr_t
then you're probably debugging, not performance-tuning, so the cast to u64
is acceptable.


It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.069 / U:0.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site