lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible?
Roman Zippel wrote:
> Um, another point, let's ignore "minimum invasive migration plans", if we
> found a good solution, we can still figure out how to get there smoothly,
> so this shouldn't be a primary concern.

In my next posting, I just wrote (this very minute)

"For brainstorming's sake, let's not worry about backward-compatibility
for now:"

So I guess I don't need this disclaimer then ;-)

- Werner

--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.145 / U:5.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site