[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Select voltage manually in cpufreq

> > I've added possibility to manualy force specified frequency and
> > voltage... That's fairly usefull for testing, and I believe this (or
> > something equivalent) is needed because every 2nd bios seems to be
> > b0rken.
> Why are all the power/cpu patches so complex? Can't we have a
> two-mode style operation, "slow-low-power" and "fast-high-power" or
> something? Would that not work with 99% or what people need and also
> be somewhat more uniform across platforms, CPUs, etc?

Well, and does slow-low-power mean 300MHz, 1.4V as bios said, or
300MHz, 1.2V which is probably also safe?

What about
running-low-and-can-not-give-enough-current"? That's different from
"fast-high-power", but it is *also* different from
"slow-low-power". [This actually matters on beasts like zaurus]. What
"as-low-power-as-possible-but-make-sure-you-can-keep-display-up"? [On
some machines cpu must be > some HMz for display to still work].

Power managment is complex...
Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building,
cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.057 / U:8.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site