Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Feb 2003 20:15:35 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][2.5] IRQ distribution patch for 2.5.58 |
| |
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:08:55PM -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: + spin_lock(&desc->lock); + irq_balance_mask[selected_irq] = target_cpu_mask; + spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Wrong.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:52:35PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > The desc locking for irq_balance_mask looks very strange, what made you > put it in?
I only quoted the patch. I've got enough going wrong with hackers running wild and stuffing bitmasks, ASCII art, and possibly even JPEG's into my RTE's without changing thelocking.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |