[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.5] IRQ distribution patch for 2.5.58
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:08:55PM -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
+ spin_lock(&desc->lock);
+ irq_balance_mask[selected_irq] = target_cpu_mask;
+ spin_unlock(&desc->lock);

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Wrong.

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:52:35PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> The desc locking for irq_balance_mask looks very strange, what made you
> put it in?

I only quoted the patch. I've got enough going wrong with hackers
running wild and stuffing bitmasks, ASCII art, and possibly even JPEG's
into my RTE's without changing thelocking.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.044 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site