lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.5] Protect smp_call_function_data w/ spinlocks on Alpha
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:16:12PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Ok the reason being is that the lock not only protects the
> smp_call_function_data pointer but also acts as a lock for that critical
> section. Without it you'll constantly be overwriting the pointer halfway
> through IPI acceptance (or even worse whilst a remote CPU is assigning the
> data members).

Really. Show me the sequence there?

I happen to like the pointer_lock a lot, and think we should
make more use of it on systems known to have cmpxchg. It
saves on the number of cache lines that have to get bounced
between processors.


r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.050 / U:1.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site