[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fw: 2.5.61 oops running SDET

> OK, I did the following, which is what I think you wanted, plus Zwane's
> observation that task_state acquires the task_struct lock (we're the only
> caller, so I just removed it), but I still get the same panic and this time
> the box hung. No doubt I've just done something stupid in the patch ...
> (task_state takes the tasklist_lock ... is that safe to do inside task_lock?)

It looks like you now try and take the tasklist_lock inside a task_lock()
region, but task_lock says no-can-do:

/* Protects ->fs, ->files, ->mm, and synchronises with wait4(). Nests
* inside tasklist_lock */
static inline void task_lock(struct task_struct *p)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.060 / U:1.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site